The Devil is a Woman

I’ve been reading up a little on this topic. It started when reading some material on this blog by a guy who is on a personal quest for Lucifer. I then wrote this piece on the topic of God is Satan, where it seemed to me that Satan, who is by actual meaning the “opposed” of God really represents what had been suppressed by designation of God as only masculine long ago. Rather than “opposed” if we say “opposite” which is the same thing without the judgement involved, then opposite the sole masculine attributes of God are the missing feminine attributes. Apparently too in occult literature Adam who was made in the image of God was considered to be androgynous because God was understood as having both masculine and feminine attributes. So it is only after the split where Eve was made from Adam’s ribs that both Eve and the Devil came into being.

As an offshoot, it’s interesting here that exactly the same actions are taken by God and Satan:

“AND Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.” (I Chronicles 21:1)

“AND again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.” (II Samuel 24:1)

There’s a whole bunch of material about that connection that’s too much for this post to go into more but I want to post some interesting patterns that are spread throughout the Bible derived by Gematria (system of assigning numerical value to a word or phrase).

Gematria

Here’s some notes on Margaret Starbird’s book Magdalene’s lost legacy.

The number 1 is the one God (Monad) or solar (male) principle. Number 6 represents physical (material) creation. In both Hebrew and Greek calculating the numbers of a bunch of phrases around God, when named YHWH give the total of 111. For example: “YHWH God” (Gen 3:9) = 111; “I am YHWH your God” (Exd 6: 7) & “YHWH God most high” = 111 x 2.

So 6 (physical manifestation) x 111 (Solar power) = 666
OR in other words the Solar power manifested in the physical plane.

Then an interesting phrase “and his number is 666″ (Rev 13:18) = 2368

“Jesus Christ” = 2368

Then there’s “Jesus” in English Gemantria (seen in this picture): J = 1, E = 5, S = 1 and U = 3, S = 1 adds up to 11. The connection here is (1+1=2) and both two and eleven are the chief numbers of Lucifer. When you take the more traditional Gematria values (A=1 through Z=26), then you also get:

JESUS = 74
LUCIFER = 74

74 + 74 = 148 = MORNING STAR.

Now Jesus and Lucifer are mentioned in the Bible as both the bringers of light and the bright and morning star. So how did Lucifer get the bad name?

Jesus says:

“I am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.” (Rev. 22:16)

Could it be that Lucifer is actually the repressed female side of Jesus?

There’s actually evidence to suggest that in the Gnostic gospels. That Mary Magdalene was named by Jesus as not only the highest of all the apostles, as well as his lover but also Mary the harbinger of light or in Latin – Mary Lucifer. Much is apparently written about that in the Secret History of Lucifer by Lynn Picknett.

What’s interesting for me is this piece of text (link below) by J. W. Ritter (1776-1810):

“…the androgyne was the perfect, ‘total’ human being of the future… For Ritter the man of the future would be, like Christ, an androgyne. ‘Eve,’ he wrote ‘was engendered by man without the aid of woman; Christ was engendered by woman without the aid of man; the androgyne will be born of the two. But the husband and wife will be fused together in a single flesh.’ The body that is to be born will then be immortal.”

http://watch.pair.com/virgo.html

It reminds me about a soul union state and the idea that Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene had achieved this becoming as such, one entity – “fused together in a single flesh”. Ritter writes this like it’s something that has or is set to happen. Note that he wrote this already a few hundred years ago.

There’s a number of interpretations of the Revelations about a union between Lucifer and Jesus, for example the image of the slain lamb (Christ) with seven eyes and seven horns (Revelation 5:6).

Is it possible given that Mary Magdalene and Lucifer are of the same declaration and the various links between Lucifer and Jesus describe a coming together or a soul union state? A state when the feminine principle (when suppressed takes the negative form) and the male (solar) principle are in perfected harmony? It appears to be mentioned again with the resolution of Book of Revelations being represented by the marriage between Jesus and his bride.

“Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.” (Rev 19:7)

So if the Lamb here is Jesus, would not the bride be Mary Magdalene? Could the marriage describe a soul union state on earth?

The idea of a soul union state between two is something I’ve only heard taught by AJ and Mary, who talk about this through their experience of the very thing happening. I’m not sure if this below is the same that that goes into detail about the process but it does mention the soul union state.

9 thoughts on “The Devil is a Woman

  1. David Wall Post author

    Here’s some things I left out of the post as it was complicated enough already…

    Have a look at the links between numbers like 11, 33, and the Magic Square of the SUN (Son)

    01 – 35 – 34 – 03 – 32 – 06 = 111
    30 – 08 – 28 – 27 – 11 – 07 = 111
    24 – 23 – 15 – 16 –14 – 19 = 111
    13 – 17 – 21 – 22 – 20 – 18 = 111
    12 – 26 – 09 – 10 – 29 – 25 = 111
    31 – 02 – 04 – 33 – 05 – 36 = 111

    For notice how each row or column adds up to 111 (11×10)
    This making 6 rows or 6 columns adding up to 666
    And surrounding the center as diagonals are matching pairs of numbers that add up to 37, the Fine Structure Constant

    http://www.davidjayjordan.com/More33Confirmations.html

    Then there’s this…

    A 1 x 9 = 9
    B 2 x 9 = 18
    C 3 x 9 = 27
    D 4 x 9 = 36
    E 5 x 9 = 45
    F 6 x 9 = 54
    G 7 x 9 = 63
    H 8 x 9 = 72
    I 9 x 9 = 81
    J 10 x 9 = 90
    K 11 x 9 = 99
    L 12 x 9 = 108
    M 13 x 9 = 117
    N 14 x 9 = 126
    O 15 x 9 = 135
    P 16 x 9 = 144
    Q 17 x 9 = 153
    R 18 x 9 = 162
    S 19 x 9 = 171
    T 20 x 9 = 180
    U 21 x 9 = 189
    V 22 x 9 = 198
    W 23 x 9 = 207
    X 24 x 9 = 216
    Y 25 x 9 = 225
    Z 26 x 9 = 234

    J E S U S
    90 + 45 + 171 + 189 + 171 = 666

    C R O S S
    27 + 162 + 135 + 171 + 171 = 666

    M E S S I A H
    117 + 45 + 171 + 171 + 81 + 9 + 72 = 666

    L U C I F E R
    108 + 189 + 27 + 81 + 54 + 45 + 162 = 666

    Reply
  2. David Wall Post author

    And just to clarify, I’m not saying this proves Jesus is a fraud or anything as such. For me personally it’s an interesting look at the effects of suppressing what is an essentially part of ourselves – the feminine principle and how this action warps not only our own mythologies but us as a whole. It is so ingrained in us (both men and woman) and so deep within our human emotional psyche that we act out in defiance or feel defeated by this apparent “battle of the sexes” that’s really something that has missed the mark by a long shot.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: The Merovingians have lost our number 1 « Disorderly Happiness

  4. dizwell

    Fascinating. Just a couple of issues.

    “Lucifer” is a Latin translation of a Hebrew reference in Isaiah, to ‘Helel’, meaning ‘shining one’ (and hence the fact that Jesus is referred to as Lucifer in Revelations). The association of ‘shining one’ to ‘the devil’ was not made until the time of Origen in around the 3rd century.

    Cross is an English word, derived from Latin’s ‘crux’.

    Messiah is an English word, derived ultimately from the Hebrew Mashiaẖ, meaning ‘annointed’.

    The word ‘Jesus’ is a transliteration of Iēsoûs, which itself is Greek translation of Yĕhōšuă, or the Aramaic Yēšûă‘.

    So, knowing that, why would you assign numeric values to English words rather than their Latin, Aramaic or Hebrew originals? I mean, if you translate all your words into, let’s say, French, what numbers do you get when you compare “messie” with “croisées”? Do they all still match up? And if they don’t, are you suggesting that God is an Englishman?

    Irrational hocus-pocus, I’d call it. Sorry.

    Reply
    1. David Wall Post author

      You might have a point there. God is an English gentleman. Well I don’t take the number thing too seriously apart from being an interesting coincidence along with the assertion that Lucifer and Jesus have a lot of things in common as you mentioned. Aren’t woman meant to be irrational? There’s not much rationality in that assertion either.

      Reply
    2. David Wall Post author

      Oh it’s Howard!! Sorry didn’t recall till I checked the link. Just one point, the gematria mentioned is mostly from Margaret Starbird who uses the early Greek bible text and Hebrew (old testament). Even more humorous now I know it’s you in ref to earlier comment about God being English. I’m sure the English would be happy to claim Him or Her whatever your preference.

      What was Blake’s poem about Jesus coming to Britain? Had to learn that one as a boy to sing at Church. “..walk upon England’s mountains green.. And did they… In ancient times” best my memory serves me now! What’s that all about?

      How’s things with you?

      Reply
    3. Luci's cat

      It’s quite obvious it does not work for other scripts or languages. Doesn’t mean it’s not valid. You need to look at relations between objects of the same value rather than a single occurrence. And theoretically you can’t do it for the God object, he has no name. At least, nobody knows it.

      Reply
  5. Pingback: Here’s the scoop on the Satan Claus dreams « Disorderly Happiness

  6. Anonymous

    God forbids the practices you and A.J. Miller practice. Sprituism, numerology, etc. You both and all Millers followers blaspheme God & Jesus & Holy Spirit. Mark.3:28-29.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s